Special Theory of Consiousness

Incident:
Myself and my friend are standing on a ground and there is a apple tree in between us. Initially both of us are facing towards the apple tree and we see a apple standing on the tree. After some time my friend turns around and starts observing a cricket match going on in the ground while i continue to observe the apple. After some time the apple falls down to the ground.

Observation by my consciousness:
I know that the apple had moved from the top of the tree to the ground.

Observation by my friend:
He still assumes that the apple is on the top of the tree.

You will get different answers from both of us if you ask us where the apple is. Which of us is correct. You would tell that i am right as the information that my friend has is outdated. He is having a information that was true at a previous time and not now.

So time is considered to be a consistent scale according to which everything else is measured. Even our consciousness. Is this true? Can our consciousness be dependent on time.

This experiment failes terribly the output it gave is identical, no matter what i did..I observed the variable or not ,the results were always the same. The reason i failed is simple . The random number generator i made is not random at all. It is based on some algorithm. ie it is a pseudo random number generator. Now for present time if you observe we have no real way of calculating a true random number except one. You do it yourselves. Now this is a interesting topic. Creation of Random Numbers. Who can create a true random number. Only a truly free thing can do that. Creating a random number is equivalent to the process of creation of universe. The very fact that humans cannot make something create a random number is because we are not giving it freedom and we are asking it to be a free thing which is not possible. So we will never be able to ask something to produce a random number for us. Having said that humans can create a random number. Now this following statement i am going to make is really interesting. We humans think we can make a random number. But this is a random number only to our consiousness. Let me explain. suppose we have a function
function tommy()
{
be alive()
learn numbers;
print 1;
print 2;
print 43;
die()
}

for an outsiders view tommy is very much predictable, I know that tommy is going to be born and then it will print 1 ,2,43 and then die.

but let us examine from tommy's perspective. Tommy is born and tommy does not know anything about what is going to happen next. Then it comes accross printing 1. It thinks it has done it all by itself. It still does not know what happens next. It starts printing 2. Even if it had wanted to, it could not change. But it thinks again that it has done something by its own because it cannot c anyone forcing it to do something. Its in a flow and it does not know that. If it had wanted to print 3 it couldnt have done that. But tommy believes he could have done that. Eventually tommy dies. We humans are also sometimes like tommy. Now if we are like tommy then our consiousness really do not have much of a power. I put this program just to open your minds to such a possibility. But we are here to proove it is not like that.

The only reason humans should be different from tommy is that humans should be able to change this code, Or there is no code that exists and humans create it on the fly. Now we do know for sure two sentences in code is applicable to humans. birth() and death(). If two sentences are write why not the rest are also the same way.

Right!!!

Wrong!!

We are never born or dead. Our consiousness had existed and will exist even when we die. Just like tommy existed before he was born and tommy exists even after he died.

Now that leads us to the fundamental question of what existence means.

Today i have read about the double slit experiment. If you dont have an idea about double slit electron experiment watch this youtube video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc&feature=related

Now i am going to construct this sort of a double slit experiment with my software to proove the inter computer human interaction is possible.

First part of the experiment.

1)I am going to c if can effect the output of a random number generator.
I am going to take a random number generator and will ask it to print a sequence of 0's and 1's. First is will just print the number given out by it for 10 rounds of my experiment. Then I repeat it by simply allowing another function to view whatever the number is being generated. And that function printing the result.

And I am going to print the result.

my experiment fails,,the value is still 0. It did not change

It can mean two means.

1)We are wrong and all this is crap
2)The force i exerted was not strong enough to make a significant change.

Tommorow i will come back with a another experiment